Reading P and C “Scene one” contributions for our QI article.

Both of their pcs point to the layered ways in which “voice” is produced at the intersection of the speaker and audience.

what does it mean to have voice in such a process – in the process of contesting particular colonialist readings of the Other – what happens to the voice of the researcher who is viewed as an “Other” (whether she takes on the label or not) in the telling?

what is the problem in how we conceptualize “voice” that allows the researcher to get positioned as victim or betrayer or the not-truely Other enough to be able to re-present authentic Others’ voices?